Congress late last week, in a truly bi-partisan move, passed the Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education Act or GIVE. This bill, later renamed the "Edward M Kennedy Serve America Act" will nearly quadruple the size of AmeriCorp from 75,000 to 250,000. AmeriCorp is the American version of the Peace Corp with its focus more of a national setting. Among the deeds this bill does is give those students or former students serving in AmeriCorp mor money for college or to pay off their loans. The money increases from $4,725 to $5,350 to be granted after service has been completed.
This bill also creates several new ways for different agencies to recieve funds via a Social Innovations Funds (SIF) as well as the Volunteer Generations Fund (VGF). The SIF will grant seed money to scale up innovative and evidence based civic infustructure inniciatives. The VGF will fund non-profit and state agencies to recruit, manage and support volunteers.
GIVE will also give middle schoolers through college students the oppertunity to engage in service during the summer and school year with the Summer of Service program aimed at middle and high schoolers. College and universities will become eligable for grants allowing their students to become active during the school year and into their professional days.
The bill, H.R. 1388, also provides seniors citizens with further oppertunities by expanding eligabilities for Senior Companions and Foster Grandparents programs.
We'll skip all the smoke blowing the official White House press release gave Sen. Kennedy, since he did help create this piece of legislature. Needless to say, this was a well timed bill as AmeriCorp has seen its number of aplicants triple in the month of March.
Monday, March 30, 2009
Friday, March 27, 2009
Friday Fun for March 27, 2009
I could do alot of stupid things right now, go on about any number of topics. Instead, I want to direct your attention to something President Obama said during his "Primetime News Conference". He said that the first step in the recovery plan has helped save the jobs of "teachers and police officers".
Teachers and police officers jobs...where have I heard all that before...oh, yeah, right here on Political Liability. An excerpt from blog entitled "My Political Platform Pt 1":
"5) More funds for teachers and police. Lets face it, crime is going to get worse as the economy does. We need to educate more children so they too will realize what exactly a bachelors degree in philosophy or archaeology will get them. "
Nice to know someone is listening...but the fun today is what President Obama was REALLY saying during his press conference. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/obama_text
President Obama: "My fellow Americans, I did not put us in this crisis, this crisis has been due to the previous eight years administration. Now, I'm not going to name names but it wasn't the first Bush. I have a four part plan for correcting this so it NEVER happens again.
Part one, listening to Political Liability and the blogger to be named later's post about HIS presidential platform, specifically jobs for teachers and cops.
Part two, stabilizing the housing market. I got a new house, so every American should be allowed to have a home. Hell, I'll give everyone 40 acres and a mule.
Part three, allow a flow of credit BACK to families so they can go back to spending money they already don't have. The EU may think this is a "way to Hell" but you have to spend money to make money, right Donald Trump.
Part four, that's the fun part. That's where we spend money based on this new budget so this never happens again. You see the millions I want to spend are only a fraction of the cost of our debt. It's for our children's generation, you want to keep them safe don't you?
And let me reiterate, that I am JUST as angry at AIG as the rest of you good people who didn't receive political contributions from them. It just angers me to no end thinking about all the money they could have contributed had it not been for a freeze in September.
But remember America, E Pluribus Unum. Questions? AP
AP: Your treasury secretary and the Fed chairman were on Capitol Hill today asking for this new authority that you want to regulate big, complex financial institutions. Why do you think the public should sign on for another new sweeping authority for the government to take over companies, essentially?
Prez: Because this was an oversight in what the government can mess with. Remember, we're for bigger government to overlook all things. The FDIC can mess with the banks but not groups like AIG. We want the authority to mess with them also.
AP: Why should the public trust the government to handle that authority well?
Prez: Because if we don't control them, then they'll be stuck in the private sector, and that's no good for anyone. NBC?
NBC: Why, given this new era of responsibility that you're asking for, why haven't you asked for something specific that the public should be sacrificing to participate in this economic recovery?
Prez: Um, they HAVE. Why do you think I'm taxing the upper 5% and getting 90% of the AIG bonuses back thanks to my friends in congress. Besides, you have to spend money to make money, that's why my budget focuses on building blocks. It's the "New New Deal". J?
J: The Democrats are writing a budget that does not include your middle class tax cuts, instead they want to phase them out. Would you sign a bill to that affect?
Prez: I've already told them what I wanted on it. I think we need to focus on the previously mentioned foundations. I knew they weren't going to Xerox it, that would cause a panic on the right. However, I feel very confident they will get done what I tell them to. And I will sign it.
J: Even without those provisions?
Prez: No...I mean, we'll have to talk it out. They know what I want, and they will get done what I tell them to. And I will sign it. CBS?
CBS: Your budget has the deficit increasing $7 Trillion over the next 10 years. The Congressional Budget Office has it at $9.3 Trillion. Republicans are calling your budget the most irresponsible in history.
Prez: Yeah, so?
CBS: Well, you said you didn't want to pass our problems to the next generation, but isn't that exactly what you are doing?
Prez: Listen, first off, it was those [people] who left us with a $1.3 Trillion debt. When our guy was in there was a surplus, their guy comes in and its all down hill. I know I said I wasn't going to mention names or that it wasn't any ONE person who did this, but it was ONE PARTY. So, I think those [people] need to check themselves before they wreck themselves. That's my first point.
My second point is that within 5 years the deficit will be cut in half. If I wanted to run again, I'll still look good, if not I'll go out on top. It's after those 5 years that are where everyone is concerned.
CBS: But you just said it's going to go up in the off years...
Prez: Listen, it's complicated, there are alot of numbers involved. Here America, have a cookie and let the grown ups worry about the bills. Univision?
Univision: Do you consider the violent spillover from Mexico a threat to national security? And how do you respond to the Governor of Texas asking for more troops and agents?
Prez: We're watching the situation. We're sending more surveillance equipment, that should be good enough. We're letting Mexico deal with most of it, our job is to make sure the cartels don't get any guns or money. I'm sure it'll work itself out. Stars and Stripes?
SS: I wanted to ask you about the Defense and Vets Administration's budget. With so many...um Sir?
Prez: Oh, sorry, I kind of spaced out. You were saying?
SS: How do you plan on saving items headed for the chopping block?
Prez: Here's a couple points I want to make, first off, we have the largest budget for vets in over 30 years. It's the right thing to do, especially since they've been forced to sacrifice over the last several years, but when you have a president who spent his tour at the bars doing blow, that's what you get.
The issue we have is how to give you money without increasing the bill on the taxpayers. Well, we are working on that. CNN?
CNN: Why did it take you so long to get mad at AIG? Was it because you realized that Geithner had no power to do anything? And more to the fact, it's not just Republicans who are bashing you, there are some Democrats who don't like your budget either. Aren't you afraid your going to leave a huge debt to YOUR children and the next president?
Prez: Yes, but as I told you there are a lot of numbers involved here. This isn't the lemonade stand you opened up, it's the United States. Listen, health care and energy are the foundations that are going to save this country. What, you didn't like your cookie?
CNN: What about my question about AIG and your anger? What took so long?
Prez: Because you wouldn't like me when I'm angry. Fox? Really, Fox??
Fox: China wants a global currency because they are nervous about our economy. Now remember, China is socialist, communist and left of center. Do you think you're asking them to spend too much money?
Prez: That's what the G-20 Summit is all about. Now, I haven't asked China to do anything, I just suggested the help out a little bit. Plus, Fox News, I think we're doing a pretty good job, and I think he world still views us as a super power.
Fox: And a global currency?
Prez: No chance! Politico?
P: Are you regretting cutting interest rates for mortgages and charities?
Prez: No, it's the right thing to do. Everything I do is the right thing to do, when will you people learn that?
Listen, if you really were giving it to charity, then it shouldn't matter how much you right off, right? It's that top 1% that we want to tax to help us because they are too damn rich. It's not going to hurt if they don't get back everything they want.
P: Are you saying that charities are wrong when they say this will discourage people from giving?
Prez: Yes, they are wrong. The best thing for them to do is shut up and wait until the economy turns back around, then they'll be just fine. KC?
KC: What would you say to those who now reside in tent cities? After all, 1 in every 50 children are currently homeless.
Prez: Well, obviously the best thing I could do is get their mommy and daddy jobs. It kills me that there are homeless children when Madonna is looking to adopt and Octo-mom has 16 kids in her house. But, we're working on it. ABC?
ABC: Really? Can I ask you about being black?
Prez: Sure, or should I say fo shizzle
ABC: In the last 64 days, has anyone brought up the fact that you are indeed African American?
Prez: Um, no. People love me or hate me based off one thing, my performance. That's the way it should be. Washington Times?
WT: Thanks.
Prez: Fo sho.
WT: I was wondering if you wrestled with the stem-cell research issue.
Prez: Good question, and the answer is so obviously yes, everyday of my life, but its the right thing to do. And that's not just my opinion, it's other peoples too. Besides, I can't let some crazy ideology from the middle ages tell me what I can and cannot do. Last question SC?
SC: What are your hopes for a peaceful solution between Palestine and Israel?
Prez: Well, we are going to stay persistently on top of the situation. We are going to push for a two state resolution that will make everyone happy. Hey, remember St. Patty's Day? We had people here partying from Northern Ireland and Ireland, and they were sworn enemies. We can do it as long as we stay persistent.
END
Teachers and police officers jobs...where have I heard all that before...oh, yeah, right here on Political Liability. An excerpt from blog entitled "My Political Platform Pt 1":
"5) More funds for teachers and police. Lets face it, crime is going to get worse as the economy does. We need to educate more children so they too will realize what exactly a bachelors degree in philosophy or archaeology will get them. "
Nice to know someone is listening...but the fun today is what President Obama was REALLY saying during his press conference. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/obama_text
President Obama: "My fellow Americans, I did not put us in this crisis, this crisis has been due to the previous eight years administration. Now, I'm not going to name names but it wasn't the first Bush. I have a four part plan for correcting this so it NEVER happens again.
Part one, listening to Political Liability and the blogger to be named later's post about HIS presidential platform, specifically jobs for teachers and cops.
Part two, stabilizing the housing market. I got a new house, so every American should be allowed to have a home. Hell, I'll give everyone 40 acres and a mule.
Part three, allow a flow of credit BACK to families so they can go back to spending money they already don't have. The EU may think this is a "way to Hell" but you have to spend money to make money, right Donald Trump.
Part four, that's the fun part. That's where we spend money based on this new budget so this never happens again. You see the millions I want to spend are only a fraction of the cost of our debt. It's for our children's generation, you want to keep them safe don't you?
And let me reiterate, that I am JUST as angry at AIG as the rest of you good people who didn't receive political contributions from them. It just angers me to no end thinking about all the money they could have contributed had it not been for a freeze in September.
But remember America, E Pluribus Unum. Questions? AP
AP: Your treasury secretary and the Fed chairman were on Capitol Hill today asking for this new authority that you want to regulate big, complex financial institutions. Why do you think the public should sign on for another new sweeping authority for the government to take over companies, essentially?
Prez: Because this was an oversight in what the government can mess with. Remember, we're for bigger government to overlook all things. The FDIC can mess with the banks but not groups like AIG. We want the authority to mess with them also.
AP: Why should the public trust the government to handle that authority well?
Prez: Because if we don't control them, then they'll be stuck in the private sector, and that's no good for anyone. NBC?
NBC: Why, given this new era of responsibility that you're asking for, why haven't you asked for something specific that the public should be sacrificing to participate in this economic recovery?
Prez: Um, they HAVE. Why do you think I'm taxing the upper 5% and getting 90% of the AIG bonuses back thanks to my friends in congress. Besides, you have to spend money to make money, that's why my budget focuses on building blocks. It's the "New New Deal". J?
J: The Democrats are writing a budget that does not include your middle class tax cuts, instead they want to phase them out. Would you sign a bill to that affect?
Prez: I've already told them what I wanted on it. I think we need to focus on the previously mentioned foundations. I knew they weren't going to Xerox it, that would cause a panic on the right. However, I feel very confident they will get done what I tell them to. And I will sign it.
J: Even without those provisions?
Prez: No...I mean, we'll have to talk it out. They know what I want, and they will get done what I tell them to. And I will sign it. CBS?
CBS: Your budget has the deficit increasing $7 Trillion over the next 10 years. The Congressional Budget Office has it at $9.3 Trillion. Republicans are calling your budget the most irresponsible in history.
Prez: Yeah, so?
CBS: Well, you said you didn't want to pass our problems to the next generation, but isn't that exactly what you are doing?
Prez: Listen, first off, it was those [people] who left us with a $1.3 Trillion debt. When our guy was in there was a surplus, their guy comes in and its all down hill. I know I said I wasn't going to mention names or that it wasn't any ONE person who did this, but it was ONE PARTY. So, I think those [people] need to check themselves before they wreck themselves. That's my first point.
My second point is that within 5 years the deficit will be cut in half. If I wanted to run again, I'll still look good, if not I'll go out on top. It's after those 5 years that are where everyone is concerned.
CBS: But you just said it's going to go up in the off years...
Prez: Listen, it's complicated, there are alot of numbers involved. Here America, have a cookie and let the grown ups worry about the bills. Univision?
Univision: Do you consider the violent spillover from Mexico a threat to national security? And how do you respond to the Governor of Texas asking for more troops and agents?
Prez: We're watching the situation. We're sending more surveillance equipment, that should be good enough. We're letting Mexico deal with most of it, our job is to make sure the cartels don't get any guns or money. I'm sure it'll work itself out. Stars and Stripes?
SS: I wanted to ask you about the Defense and Vets Administration's budget. With so many...um Sir?
Prez: Oh, sorry, I kind of spaced out. You were saying?
SS: How do you plan on saving items headed for the chopping block?
Prez: Here's a couple points I want to make, first off, we have the largest budget for vets in over 30 years. It's the right thing to do, especially since they've been forced to sacrifice over the last several years, but when you have a president who spent his tour at the bars doing blow, that's what you get.
The issue we have is how to give you money without increasing the bill on the taxpayers. Well, we are working on that. CNN?
CNN: Why did it take you so long to get mad at AIG? Was it because you realized that Geithner had no power to do anything? And more to the fact, it's not just Republicans who are bashing you, there are some Democrats who don't like your budget either. Aren't you afraid your going to leave a huge debt to YOUR children and the next president?
Prez: Yes, but as I told you there are a lot of numbers involved here. This isn't the lemonade stand you opened up, it's the United States. Listen, health care and energy are the foundations that are going to save this country. What, you didn't like your cookie?
CNN: What about my question about AIG and your anger? What took so long?
Prez: Because you wouldn't like me when I'm angry. Fox? Really, Fox??
Fox: China wants a global currency because they are nervous about our economy. Now remember, China is socialist, communist and left of center. Do you think you're asking them to spend too much money?
Prez: That's what the G-20 Summit is all about. Now, I haven't asked China to do anything, I just suggested the help out a little bit. Plus, Fox News, I think we're doing a pretty good job, and I think he world still views us as a super power.
Fox: And a global currency?
Prez: No chance! Politico?
P: Are you regretting cutting interest rates for mortgages and charities?
Prez: No, it's the right thing to do. Everything I do is the right thing to do, when will you people learn that?
Listen, if you really were giving it to charity, then it shouldn't matter how much you right off, right? It's that top 1% that we want to tax to help us because they are too damn rich. It's not going to hurt if they don't get back everything they want.
P: Are you saying that charities are wrong when they say this will discourage people from giving?
Prez: Yes, they are wrong. The best thing for them to do is shut up and wait until the economy turns back around, then they'll be just fine. KC?
KC: What would you say to those who now reside in tent cities? After all, 1 in every 50 children are currently homeless.
Prez: Well, obviously the best thing I could do is get their mommy and daddy jobs. It kills me that there are homeless children when Madonna is looking to adopt and Octo-mom has 16 kids in her house. But, we're working on it. ABC?
ABC: Really? Can I ask you about being black?
Prez: Sure, or should I say fo shizzle
ABC: In the last 64 days, has anyone brought up the fact that you are indeed African American?
Prez: Um, no. People love me or hate me based off one thing, my performance. That's the way it should be. Washington Times?
WT: Thanks.
Prez: Fo sho.
WT: I was wondering if you wrestled with the stem-cell research issue.
Prez: Good question, and the answer is so obviously yes, everyday of my life, but its the right thing to do. And that's not just my opinion, it's other peoples too. Besides, I can't let some crazy ideology from the middle ages tell me what I can and cannot do. Last question SC?
SC: What are your hopes for a peaceful solution between Palestine and Israel?
Prez: Well, we are going to stay persistently on top of the situation. We are going to push for a two state resolution that will make everyone happy. Hey, remember St. Patty's Day? We had people here partying from Northern Ireland and Ireland, and they were sworn enemies. We can do it as long as we stay persistent.
END
Thursday, March 26, 2009
Now you can follow us
That's right, I gave in to the temptation. Ladies and gentlemen, I am "proud" to announce that Political Liability is now on twitter. How can you find us you wonder. Well it's easy, when you jump onto twitter search for "Political Liability" or our user name "notsotrue".
Boredom has never been so fun.
***EIDTORS NOTE: Of the list below only the following have twitter accounts: Anderson Cooper, "Ann Coulter", Lou Dobbs, "Neil Patrick Harris" and Tony Reali. Shepherd Smith, you need to get on your game and get cought up with AC360. Same with you O'Reilly, if you want to be Lou Dobbs. I don't know, maybe Fox won't let you tweet. Oh, Meatloaf and Alice Cooper...you could do worse. Finally, I put in a request to be allowed to follow Snoop, I hope he says yes.***
Boredom has never been so fun.
***EIDTORS NOTE: Of the list below only the following have twitter accounts: Anderson Cooper, "Ann Coulter", Lou Dobbs, "Neil Patrick Harris" and Tony Reali. Shepherd Smith, you need to get on your game and get cought up with AC360. Same with you O'Reilly, if you want to be Lou Dobbs. I don't know, maybe Fox won't let you tweet. Oh, Meatloaf and Alice Cooper...you could do worse. Finally, I put in a request to be allowed to follow Snoop, I hope he says yes.***
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Giving Big Brother What They Want
I have always found it interesting when people complain about "Big Brother" is watching, the government is reading our email, bugging our phones, tapping our kegs...well, you know what I mean. What makes this so interesting is the amount that we complain about it and yet anyone with access to a computer can find out what you are doing at anytime you allow them to. And the best part is, there are really no government regulations on what can and cannot be said over the Internet. It's kind of where total freedom of speech meets invasion of privacy and has a little baby that makes the rock relationship all better, you know those marriages.
Myspace, facebook and livejournal allow their users all sorts of access and freedom to write whatever they want to. Great, first amendment right at its best. They even allow their users to spread horrible and vicious rumors under false pretences. Take the case in Missouri a few years back for instance. A mother, posing as a girls classmate, ridicules the girl to the point that she kills herself over the attacks all on myspace for the world to see. The sad part is, this is by no means an isolated incident.
There are also a handful of incidences where teachers have lost their jobs for posting pictures on their facebook account with drinks in their hand. It's generally known that people working with children get burnt out after 4 years, so I don't begrudge them drinking. But seriously, I just don't know if I want you teaching my child if your not smart enough NOT to post pictures of you getting plastered with your girlfriends Friday night. And don't complain when you get fired when your boss, who your probably stupid enough to have as a buddy, checks it out. Besides, you never know who their friends are.
Blogging in general gives us all a greater sense that what we have to say means something to people. Well, judging by the amount of "followers" this blog has, I can tell you that is not necessarily the case at all. Back in the day, dating myself, sisters used to get mad about their little brothers, older brothers, parents, what have you reading their journals hearing about this and that, now we'll gladly share it on the Internet so everyone can see it, or hear about it.
And now the latest craze is twitter, which allows you to answer the ultimate question, "What are you doing?" And what makes it great is that on their actual website, twitter claims that we should all do this because if your at a party and your friends tweet you they may want to join you at the party. Seriously? Listen, (or read) if I'm at a party and my friends aren't and the best thing they can think of is to twitter me to see what I'm doing...well, maybe there's a reason they weren't invited. However, on the plus side, this does allow me to see what minor celebs and pointless news media people are doing.
My twitter list: Jon Stewart; Bill O'Reilly; Shepherd Smith; Anderson Cooper; Neil Patrick Harris; Wolf Blitzer; Ann Coulter; Lou Dobbs; Snoop Dogg; Tony Reali; Meatloaf; Alice Cooper; and 95% of those who would tweet me, just to name a few.
Sorry, I got off topic, these thing can be addictive. My point is, what's the point in complaining about the government interfering in your everyday life if you let them in openly? Be smart about what you do and how you do it, you just never know whose watching.
COMING SOON TO A TWITTER NEAR YOU...POLITICAL LIABILITY. I just have to fight the urge of self-respect and dignity that tell me not to join.
Myspace, facebook and livejournal allow their users all sorts of access and freedom to write whatever they want to. Great, first amendment right at its best. They even allow their users to spread horrible and vicious rumors under false pretences. Take the case in Missouri a few years back for instance. A mother, posing as a girls classmate, ridicules the girl to the point that she kills herself over the attacks all on myspace for the world to see. The sad part is, this is by no means an isolated incident.
There are also a handful of incidences where teachers have lost their jobs for posting pictures on their facebook account with drinks in their hand. It's generally known that people working with children get burnt out after 4 years, so I don't begrudge them drinking. But seriously, I just don't know if I want you teaching my child if your not smart enough NOT to post pictures of you getting plastered with your girlfriends Friday night. And don't complain when you get fired when your boss, who your probably stupid enough to have as a buddy, checks it out. Besides, you never know who their friends are.
Blogging in general gives us all a greater sense that what we have to say means something to people. Well, judging by the amount of "followers" this blog has, I can tell you that is not necessarily the case at all. Back in the day, dating myself, sisters used to get mad about their little brothers, older brothers, parents, what have you reading their journals hearing about this and that, now we'll gladly share it on the Internet so everyone can see it, or hear about it.
And now the latest craze is twitter, which allows you to answer the ultimate question, "What are you doing?" And what makes it great is that on their actual website, twitter claims that we should all do this because if your at a party and your friends tweet you they may want to join you at the party. Seriously? Listen, (or read) if I'm at a party and my friends aren't and the best thing they can think of is to twitter me to see what I'm doing...well, maybe there's a reason they weren't invited. However, on the plus side, this does allow me to see what minor celebs and pointless news media people are doing.
My twitter list: Jon Stewart; Bill O'Reilly; Shepherd Smith; Anderson Cooper; Neil Patrick Harris; Wolf Blitzer; Ann Coulter; Lou Dobbs; Snoop Dogg; Tony Reali; Meatloaf; Alice Cooper; and 95% of those who would tweet me, just to name a few.
Sorry, I got off topic, these thing can be addictive. My point is, what's the point in complaining about the government interfering in your everyday life if you let them in openly? Be smart about what you do and how you do it, you just never know whose watching.
COMING SOON TO A TWITTER NEAR YOU...POLITICAL LIABILITY. I just have to fight the urge of self-respect and dignity that tell me not to join.
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
Lost In The Numbers
President Barack Obama will usurp tv time this week for the second time in his short presidential term. While I'm not really missing anything important tonight, this is obviously Obama's attempt at governmental transparency, plus, it's a good way to appear as though he's doing a good job.
President Obama has done a great job at turning the public's view of the White House and lifting the "Shroud of Mystery" from the Bush administration, which is something we all wanted and is long overdue. Besides, he's the everyday guy president. I mean who didn't do a little blow in college just to get by, we all know it was young Bush's drug of choice. What a lame-o Clinton looks like, Mr. "I didn't inhale". And who doesn't really love filling out NCAA Brackets for ESPN, they allow to fill out up to 10, TEN BRACKETS. And who doesn't feel mentally or physically challenged when they bowl knowing they could score 300 if they could knock all the pins down, I know I do. After all, it could be worse, as he said on the campaign trail, it could be four more years of Bush policies.
But the real question, one I hope is asked and actually followed up on, is about the ABC News report that came out last week about AIG and their generous gifts to many of our beloved politicians. And while Senator Dodd (D- Conn) is getting the brunt of the backlash due to his receiving a little more than $103,000 from the money sucking group in 2008, the question lingers, who is number 2?
The answer...President Obama who received a grand total of $101,332 in donations from the failing financial institution including a reported $23,000 or little more then 1/6th of the $120,000 in political contributions AIG made AFTER it received $85 BILLION in taxpayer bailout. But that was 2008, when he was a struggling senator from Illinois just trying, like all Americans to better his life for him and his family by finding a new job. He needed all the financial help he could get. Besides, it's not like he was alone.
John McCain was behind him receiving almost $59,500 in funds from AIG. And right behind him, receiving almost $36,000 was former first lady turned former senator turned former presidential nominee turned Secretary of State who needed financial assistance because her campaign went belly up Hillary Rodham Clinton. But AIG is an international group, so maybe this was more so she would spread the word of AIG to foreign dignitaries.
Of course, there is Vice President Joe "not in my neighborhood" Biden who only received a little under $20,000 in taxpayer money. But seeing as 7 of the top 12 politicians the received financial backing from AIG were from the Atlantic Northeast (2 from Conn and NY, 1 from NH, Del, and Penn for a grand total of $222,490 taxpayer dollars), I guess that IS what they do in his neighborhood.
Other notables include former mayor Giulliani ($13,200) and AIG hearing chairman Rep. Kanjorski (D Penn; $12,000)
to find out more, why not visit the actual article http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=7110145&page=1
Here is what I am proposing the government consider. And while it may all seem good, just keep in mind that like many Americans I have no real idea how this would affect the actual "market". But, my grand idea, since we are a nation built on credit (of which China holds an amazing 1 Trillion dollars of) why not nix $5,000 off everyone's credit. An American Credit Forgiveness Act.
While this might not even be a feasible solution to our everyday problems, this will give the American people some area to go out and rack up more credit for themselves. This would give people the chance who other wise couldn't buy a home or car due to credit issues a new lease on life (excuse the pun). I did hear talk of resetting the credit scores, which would ideally be the same. This is what the American people need. With unemployment on the rise, the American people could use this act to stay afloat.
President Obama has done a great job at turning the public's view of the White House and lifting the "Shroud of Mystery" from the Bush administration, which is something we all wanted and is long overdue. Besides, he's the everyday guy president. I mean who didn't do a little blow in college just to get by, we all know it was young Bush's drug of choice. What a lame-o Clinton looks like, Mr. "I didn't inhale". And who doesn't really love filling out NCAA Brackets for ESPN, they allow to fill out up to 10, TEN BRACKETS. And who doesn't feel mentally or physically challenged when they bowl knowing they could score 300 if they could knock all the pins down, I know I do. After all, it could be worse, as he said on the campaign trail, it could be four more years of Bush policies.
But the real question, one I hope is asked and actually followed up on, is about the ABC News report that came out last week about AIG and their generous gifts to many of our beloved politicians. And while Senator Dodd (D- Conn) is getting the brunt of the backlash due to his receiving a little more than $103,000 from the money sucking group in 2008, the question lingers, who is number 2?
The answer...President Obama who received a grand total of $101,332 in donations from the failing financial institution including a reported $23,000 or little more then 1/6th of the $120,000 in political contributions AIG made AFTER it received $85 BILLION in taxpayer bailout. But that was 2008, when he was a struggling senator from Illinois just trying, like all Americans to better his life for him and his family by finding a new job. He needed all the financial help he could get. Besides, it's not like he was alone.
John McCain was behind him receiving almost $59,500 in funds from AIG. And right behind him, receiving almost $36,000 was former first lady turned former senator turned former presidential nominee turned Secretary of State who needed financial assistance because her campaign went belly up Hillary Rodham Clinton. But AIG is an international group, so maybe this was more so she would spread the word of AIG to foreign dignitaries.
Of course, there is Vice President Joe "not in my neighborhood" Biden who only received a little under $20,000 in taxpayer money. But seeing as 7 of the top 12 politicians the received financial backing from AIG were from the Atlantic Northeast (2 from Conn and NY, 1 from NH, Del, and Penn for a grand total of $222,490 taxpayer dollars), I guess that IS what they do in his neighborhood.
Other notables include former mayor Giulliani ($13,200) and AIG hearing chairman Rep. Kanjorski (D Penn; $12,000)
to find out more, why not visit the actual article http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=7110145&page=1
Here is what I am proposing the government consider. And while it may all seem good, just keep in mind that like many Americans I have no real idea how this would affect the actual "market". But, my grand idea, since we are a nation built on credit (of which China holds an amazing 1 Trillion dollars of) why not nix $5,000 off everyone's credit. An American Credit Forgiveness Act.
While this might not even be a feasible solution to our everyday problems, this will give the American people some area to go out and rack up more credit for themselves. This would give people the chance who other wise couldn't buy a home or car due to credit issues a new lease on life (excuse the pun). I did hear talk of resetting the credit scores, which would ideally be the same. This is what the American people need. With unemployment on the rise, the American people could use this act to stay afloat.
Monday, March 23, 2009
Good day fellow citizens of Earth. I am Dr. Chaos, the appointed Drug Czar of Political Liability. What is a Drug Czar you might ask? Good question. Let’s break it down. Dictionary.com claims a drug is "a chemical substance used in the treatment, cure, prevention, or diagnosis of disease or used to otherwise enhance physical or mental well-being." The site also claims a Czar is "any person exercising great authority or power in a particular field." Therefore I am a person with great authority and power in the field of chemical substances used to enhance well-being. How did I gain this authority and power you might ask? Again, an excellent question (you’re doing quite well today) Extensive and continual personal research. And it is my pledge you to, citizens of Earth, to continue this research as long as I hold this very important office. In fact, as I sit and write this inaugural article on this fine Friday morning, I am under the influence of no less than four drugs. (Five if you count the residual traces from last night.) Don’t worry, I am a Doctor. I do warn you, the reader, not to try any of my research on your own as only someone with my particular biological advantages can even attempt such cutting edge experimentation. So remember, don’t try this at home kids.
Friday, March 20, 2009
Friday Fun for March 20, 2009
While "Political Liability" has several great post, I am sorry to say that this will not be one of them. Instead, as an attempt to mix seriousness with fun, I am going to start a segment called "Friday Fun". It's attempt to lighten up the mood and show that we have a sense of humor. So, here we go...
It was nice to see the President on TV without really taking up any TV time. In the past two days Barack Obama had been on both Sportscenter and Jay Leno proving that he really is trying to reach all audiences. And in doing so, he has proven once again, that our leaders don't know that feet go on the floor and not in their mouths. I could really care less if Duke's coach K wanted to swipe back at Obama for not picking his team by saying the President should stick to fixing the economy. What is problematic is Obama telling Leno that his bowling is "like the Special Olympics or something". Nice, way to make the mentally and physically challenged feel like they have the full support of the president. But I guess when your following Bush, these little gaffes don't seem so bad.
E! Online, that's right, I'm using them as a source again and trust me no one dies more inside then myself, however, they are reporting that Fred Durst is reuniting Limp Bizkit. That's right, after last really being seen being booed out of Chicago, the Chocolate Starfish is bringing his Hot Dog flavored water to a town near you. And with Eminem putting out a new album, maybe we'll get a pre-21st century grudge match going again. All this, along with Jonathan Davis of Korn releasing a new single that is all over the radio, I just have wonder, did I wake up in the past?
I'd like to thank the NCAA Selection Committee for really making the big conferences look good. Not only did they only put in 4 at large "mid majors" and smaller conferences, they made it so there would be no real chance they make it out of the first round. Of course, we are only half way through said first round, so I might be pulling a Barack Obama and be sticking my foot in my mouth, but we'll find out.
Well, everyone have a good weekend and stay safe. And if your in the Miami area, watch out this weekend for Donte Stallworth as the Cleveland Brown wideout is still a free man and maybe driving over a corner near you. No, seriously, it's a tragedy what happened and hopefully everything gets straighten out and justice is found.
It was nice to see the President on TV without really taking up any TV time. In the past two days Barack Obama had been on both Sportscenter and Jay Leno proving that he really is trying to reach all audiences. And in doing so, he has proven once again, that our leaders don't know that feet go on the floor and not in their mouths. I could really care less if Duke's coach K wanted to swipe back at Obama for not picking his team by saying the President should stick to fixing the economy. What is problematic is Obama telling Leno that his bowling is "like the Special Olympics or something". Nice, way to make the mentally and physically challenged feel like they have the full support of the president. But I guess when your following Bush, these little gaffes don't seem so bad.
E! Online, that's right, I'm using them as a source again and trust me no one dies more inside then myself, however, they are reporting that Fred Durst is reuniting Limp Bizkit. That's right, after last really being seen being booed out of Chicago, the Chocolate Starfish is bringing his Hot Dog flavored water to a town near you. And with Eminem putting out a new album, maybe we'll get a pre-21st century grudge match going again. All this, along with Jonathan Davis of Korn releasing a new single that is all over the radio, I just have wonder, did I wake up in the past?
I'd like to thank the NCAA Selection Committee for really making the big conferences look good. Not only did they only put in 4 at large "mid majors" and smaller conferences, they made it so there would be no real chance they make it out of the first round. Of course, we are only half way through said first round, so I might be pulling a Barack Obama and be sticking my foot in my mouth, but we'll find out.
Well, everyone have a good weekend and stay safe. And if your in the Miami area, watch out this weekend for Donte Stallworth as the Cleveland Brown wideout is still a free man and maybe driving over a corner near you. No, seriously, it's a tragedy what happened and hopefully everything gets straighten out and justice is found.
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Things Worsening for the People of Darfur
The AP has reported that Omar al-Bashir, the president of Sudan, has once again rallied his supporters in Darfur, mocking an International Criminal Court warrant for his arrest. This is the second time he has gone into Darfur, a region of Sudan, and dismissed the charges of crimes against humanity and war crimes.
Al-Bashir is the first active leader to ever be charged of these crimes, and while he remains in Sudan he will face no punishment. And, as the AP reports, he will find safe haven with the Arab League as he is scheduled to fly out to Qatar for an Arab summit at the end of the month. He is also receiving some support from the African Union, who although have no judicial power over the leader, still are looking into the "atrocities". However, the African Union has expressed it's displeasure with al-Brashir kicking out foreign aid.
The Darfur genocide, after all that is what it is, has a death toll of at least 300,000 people and lead to the displacement of almost three million people. And while al-Brashir fights with what he calls "Western colonization" the remaining three million people will recieve no aid from the outside world as their fearless leader sends away foreign aid. According to some UN numbers, 100,000 people a month could die if foreign aid is not brought back into the Darfur.
Now, CNN is reporting that gunfire was exchanged between international peacekeepers and al-Bashir's military, ending in the death of a peacekeeper.
We as a people cannot turn our backs on this issue. There is a saying, "If we do not learn from history, we are doomed to repeat it." Well, on August 22, 1939, a week before the invasion of Poland, Hitler gave out the order to "kill without pity or mercy men, women, and children of Polish race or language". He concluded his meeting by stating, "Who still talks nowadays of the extermination of the Armenians?" (http://www.armenian-genocide.org/)
for more information, please, I urge you to visit:
http://www.savedarfur.org/
http://savedarfur.org/sites/voicefordarfur/index.php/pages/feature1
Al-Bashir is the first active leader to ever be charged of these crimes, and while he remains in Sudan he will face no punishment. And, as the AP reports, he will find safe haven with the Arab League as he is scheduled to fly out to Qatar for an Arab summit at the end of the month. He is also receiving some support from the African Union, who although have no judicial power over the leader, still are looking into the "atrocities". However, the African Union has expressed it's displeasure with al-Brashir kicking out foreign aid.
The Darfur genocide, after all that is what it is, has a death toll of at least 300,000 people and lead to the displacement of almost three million people. And while al-Brashir fights with what he calls "Western colonization" the remaining three million people will recieve no aid from the outside world as their fearless leader sends away foreign aid. According to some UN numbers, 100,000 people a month could die if foreign aid is not brought back into the Darfur.
Now, CNN is reporting that gunfire was exchanged between international peacekeepers and al-Bashir's military, ending in the death of a peacekeeper.
We as a people cannot turn our backs on this issue. There is a saying, "If we do not learn from history, we are doomed to repeat it." Well, on August 22, 1939, a week before the invasion of Poland, Hitler gave out the order to "kill without pity or mercy men, women, and children of Polish race or language". He concluded his meeting by stating, "Who still talks nowadays of the extermination of the Armenians?" (http://www.armenian-genocide.org/)
for more information, please, I urge you to visit:
http://www.savedarfur.org/
http://savedarfur.org/sites/voicefordarfur/index.php/pages/feature1
Saturday, March 14, 2009
Miley Cyrus vs Radiohead
In a recent article, Miley Cyrus had opened up about how people made fun of her while she was growing up pre-Hannah Montana. She talked about how there were a core group of girls who made fun of her and made it hard for her in school and so forth and so on. Well, no sooner was the article published and put out there, then little Miss Cyrus made yet another one of her famous public stumbles, as she is now calling out Radiohead as reported by E! online.
It appears the young pop princess felt dissed when Radiohead, upon hearing that Miley wanted to meet with her, said outright "that's not something they do". Well, showing her age, Miley Cyrus left the GRAMMY'S early because, as she told the Jayjay and Rich radio show, "I was so upset! I wasn't going to watch... I'm going to ruin them, I'm going to tell everyone."
Okay, let me see if I got this straight, you left the Grammy's, the biggest musical award show, where you performed, because the band that you refer to as your "rock gods" didn't want to stop by and say "hi". And now Miley, you think your going to ruin Radiohead by telling everyone that they dissed you? Really? Do you even know who Radiohead is? Have you heard anything they've done?
Let me put this in simple chapter and verse...Radiohead 1) will not be ruined by a Disney-made little girl who makes Asian faces, dates other Disney-made boy bands; 2) I don't even really follow Radiohead, but I'm pretty sure they are the band that dissed the MUSIC INDUSTRY by selling their album on the web and having people pay what they thought it was worth; 3) by "dissing" you they are that much cooler to their fan base.
Of course no one can say it better then the band themselves. Again as reported by E! Online, in a statement Radiohead puts the young actress (Gem wannabe, there I said it) in her place by saying "When Miley grows up, she'll learn not to have such a sense of entitlement."
It appears the young pop princess felt dissed when Radiohead, upon hearing that Miley wanted to meet with her, said outright "that's not something they do". Well, showing her age, Miley Cyrus left the GRAMMY'S early because, as she told the Jayjay and Rich radio show, "I was so upset! I wasn't going to watch... I'm going to ruin them, I'm going to tell everyone."
Okay, let me see if I got this straight, you left the Grammy's, the biggest musical award show, where you performed, because the band that you refer to as your "rock gods" didn't want to stop by and say "hi". And now Miley, you think your going to ruin Radiohead by telling everyone that they dissed you? Really? Do you even know who Radiohead is? Have you heard anything they've done?
Let me put this in simple chapter and verse...Radiohead 1) will not be ruined by a Disney-made little girl who makes Asian faces, dates other Disney-made boy bands; 2) I don't even really follow Radiohead, but I'm pretty sure they are the band that dissed the MUSIC INDUSTRY by selling their album on the web and having people pay what they thought it was worth; 3) by "dissing" you they are that much cooler to their fan base.
Of course no one can say it better then the band themselves. Again as reported by E! Online, in a statement Radiohead puts the young actress (Gem wannabe, there I said it) in her place by saying "When Miley grows up, she'll learn not to have such a sense of entitlement."
March Madness
Now, I'll be the first to admit that I have not followed college basketball this year as much as I have in the past, since I have the tendency to use up my sports viewing time on Cubs games and football on Sundays, I use the time between for other things. That being said, this year's tournament should be very interesting if its anything like the conference tournaments have been.
With the Big East upsets setting the pace for the remaining "BCS" Conferences, UofL has made their point for their first #1 seed in the NCAA Tournament since they were both the #1 seed in the Big East Tournament, and are the only team standing as they look to face a hot Syracuse team tonight. This would be the Cardinals first #1 seed since the 80's, and their first Big East Championship ever...mostly because they just joined the Big East a few years ago.
Pitt and UConn, two other teams that pre-tournaments were discussed as #1 seeds are hanging on by a thread, thanks to upset losses. However, upsets have also helped them keep their dreams alive, as Baylor has laid waste to some Big 12 teams. The Big 12 Tournament has seen Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas all go down as they head into the championship game with the previously mentioned Baylor Bears looking to go dancing if they can get past Mizzou.
All that being said, here are my top #1 seeds, but then again I don't really have a say:
University of Louisville Cardinals- they should get the #1 overall seeding with a win over the Orange. The Big East was the beast of the NCAA, and has shown how deep the conference is with the previously mentioned upsets. One thing that may hold the Cards back, the double digit loss to Notre Dame. But, if the Cardinals can get the #1 overall seeding, it may lead to the biggest pre-Derby party the city has ever seen.
Memphis Tigers- They should pull out the win today against Tulsa. The #4 Tigers haven't suffered a loss since late December against the Orange (how do they pop up in every conversation?). The Tigers, usually my favorite to win it all, have always shown up big in the Tourney, but all ways seem to fall short in the end.
University of North Carolina Tar Heels- Led by arguably the best player in the nation, the Heels are always a threat. Hansbrough will be force to handle as I'm sure he'll want to go out on top. The Heels have only loss 3 games all year, all to conference foes. While they still have to make it, if they can win their conference tourney, they may not only get the #1 overall seed, but they will likely be the favorite to win it all.
UConn Huskies- While they have loss their last 2 games, 3 of their last six and all of their match-ups against Pitt, whose ranked higher, they have Syracuse to thank. The Orange, who took out West Virginia (who beat Pitt), took the Huskies into 6 overtimes before they pulled it out. With the strong showing from the Orange, the Huskies don't look so bad.
Of course Michigan State and Duke are also good choices for the final #1 seed, they are going to have to show alot to the people who matter, and even then, it still maybe a stretch. I think of the two, the Spartans have a better chance at finding their way into that fourth spot, but they are going to have to win big in their next two games. The Dukies have a slim shot, but the depth of the Big East on top of their 2 losses to UNC leave them grasping at straws.
With the Big East upsets setting the pace for the remaining "BCS" Conferences, UofL has made their point for their first #1 seed in the NCAA Tournament since they were both the #1 seed in the Big East Tournament, and are the only team standing as they look to face a hot Syracuse team tonight. This would be the Cardinals first #1 seed since the 80's, and their first Big East Championship ever...mostly because they just joined the Big East a few years ago.
Pitt and UConn, two other teams that pre-tournaments were discussed as #1 seeds are hanging on by a thread, thanks to upset losses. However, upsets have also helped them keep their dreams alive, as Baylor has laid waste to some Big 12 teams. The Big 12 Tournament has seen Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas all go down as they head into the championship game with the previously mentioned Baylor Bears looking to go dancing if they can get past Mizzou.
All that being said, here are my top #1 seeds, but then again I don't really have a say:
University of Louisville Cardinals- they should get the #1 overall seeding with a win over the Orange. The Big East was the beast of the NCAA, and has shown how deep the conference is with the previously mentioned upsets. One thing that may hold the Cards back, the double digit loss to Notre Dame. But, if the Cardinals can get the #1 overall seeding, it may lead to the biggest pre-Derby party the city has ever seen.
Memphis Tigers- They should pull out the win today against Tulsa. The #4 Tigers haven't suffered a loss since late December against the Orange (how do they pop up in every conversation?). The Tigers, usually my favorite to win it all, have always shown up big in the Tourney, but all ways seem to fall short in the end.
University of North Carolina Tar Heels- Led by arguably the best player in the nation, the Heels are always a threat. Hansbrough will be force to handle as I'm sure he'll want to go out on top. The Heels have only loss 3 games all year, all to conference foes. While they still have to make it, if they can win their conference tourney, they may not only get the #1 overall seed, but they will likely be the favorite to win it all.
UConn Huskies- While they have loss their last 2 games, 3 of their last six and all of their match-ups against Pitt, whose ranked higher, they have Syracuse to thank. The Orange, who took out West Virginia (who beat Pitt), took the Huskies into 6 overtimes before they pulled it out. With the strong showing from the Orange, the Huskies don't look so bad.
Of course Michigan State and Duke are also good choices for the final #1 seed, they are going to have to show alot to the people who matter, and even then, it still maybe a stretch. I think of the two, the Spartans have a better chance at finding their way into that fourth spot, but they are going to have to win big in their next two games. The Dukies have a slim shot, but the depth of the Big East on top of their 2 losses to UNC leave them grasping at straws.
Friday, March 13, 2009
Legalize it!
Legalizing drugs probably isn't a great solution to America's or the world's problems. But, given all of the issues with the "war on drugs," I have to agree with the Economist in saying that legalization is the least bad alternative.
We spend tons of money trying to stop drugs from getting into our country; spend tons incarcerating our citizens for drug related offenses; enable gangsters and thugs to cut out a nice little slice of unregulated global trade; fail to treat addictions thoroughly due to a lack of funds; push producer countries into fighting a war on drugs in their countries, which leads to political instability -- all of this, and we still have drugs. The fact is that, like it or not, drugs are here and are going to stay. Quoting at length from the above linked leader:
We spend tons of money trying to stop drugs from getting into our country; spend tons incarcerating our citizens for drug related offenses; enable gangsters and thugs to cut out a nice little slice of unregulated global trade; fail to treat addictions thoroughly due to a lack of funds; push producer countries into fighting a war on drugs in their countries, which leads to political instability -- all of this, and we still have drugs. The fact is that, like it or not, drugs are here and are going to stay. Quoting at length from the above linked leader:
Legalisation would not only drive away the gangsters; it would transform drugs from a law-and-order problem into a public-health problem, which is how they ought to be treated. Governments would tax and regulate the drug trade, and use the funds raised (and the billions saved on law-enforcement) to educate the public about the risks of drug-taking and to treat addiction. The sale of drugs to minors should remain banned. Different drugs would command different levels of taxation and regulation. This system would be fiddly and imperfect, requiring constant monitoring and hard-to-measure trade-offs. Post-tax prices should be set at a level that would strike a balance between damping down use on the one hand, and discouraging a black market and the desperate acts of theft and prostitution to which addicts now resort to feed their habits.I think it is time that we step back and realize how illiberal our drug policy is, and reflect on how we can better tailor a drug regime towards reasonable safety and distance ourselves from the unrealizable goal of irradication. (Speaking of illiberal policies, I just posted on the growing anti-immigrant sentiment in Congress, this specifically related to the H-1B visa program).
Selling even this flawed system to people in producer countries, where organised crime is the central political issue, is fairly easy. The tough part comes in the consumer countries, where addiction is the main political battle. Plenty of American parents might accept that legalisation would be the right answer for the people of Latin America, Asia and Africa; they might even see its usefulness in the fight against terrorism. But their immediate fear would be for their own children.
That fear is based in large part on the presumption that more people would take drugs under a legal regime. That presumption may be wrong. There is no correlation between the harshness of drug laws and the incidence of drug-taking: citizens living under tough regimes (notably America but also Britain) take more drugs, not fewer. Embarrassed drug warriors blame this on alleged cultural differences, but even in fairly similar countries tough rules make little difference to the number of addicts: harsh Sweden and more liberal Norway have precisely the same addiction rates. Legalisation might reduce both supply (pushers by definition push) and demand (part of that dangerous thrill would go). Nobody knows for certain. But it is hard to argue that sales of any product that is made cheaper, safer and more widely available would fall. Any honest proponent of legalisation would be wise to assume that drug-taking as a whole would rise.
My Presidential Platform Pt 1
The following post was an email I had sent out February 23rd of this year, and since then the government has decided to listen to 2 of those points. Mere coincidence, sure, why not? And while I may not agree with the way the government is going about #5, its still "coincidence".
1) Legalize marijuana. The government can tax it, sell a 6 pack of joints for 60-100 dollars and make money. Still make it illegal to grow, and illegal to smoke and drive. Like liquor, it can only be smoked in coffee shops (creating jobs) and in your own home. Set the limit to an ounce.
2) Let free first time possession of marijuana offenders. It'll free up space in our prisons, and cost less for taxpayers, and after all, that's who we care about.
3) Guns for Funds. Have people bring in their guns and get money in return. This will take guns off the streets and at no time are we saying you shouldn't have one, we are just saying that if you want money give us your arsenal.
4) No Guns for Kids. After finding out an 11 year old shot his step mom with a child's model shot gun there should be something done. I just think that if we are going to concern ourselves with tobacco marketing towards kids, and whether or not Captain Crunch is trying to make our kids obese, here is an industry which makes weapons for in children sizes. It just reminds me of the old Willy Wonka where Mike TV talks about his Colt 45 and says he has to wait till he's older to get a real one and his dad replies "Not till your 12 son". Maybe if Mr. TV knew that they made it in Mike's size, then he could really have one and then had some fun at the Chocolate Factory.
5) More funds for teachers and police. Lets face it, crime is going to get worse as the economy does. We need to educate more children so they too will realize what exactly a bachelors degree in philosophy or archaeology will get them.
1) Legalize marijuana. The government can tax it, sell a 6 pack of joints for 60-100 dollars and make money. Still make it illegal to grow, and illegal to smoke and drive. Like liquor, it can only be smoked in coffee shops (creating jobs) and in your own home. Set the limit to an ounce.
2) Let free first time possession of marijuana offenders. It'll free up space in our prisons, and cost less for taxpayers, and after all, that's who we care about.
3) Guns for Funds. Have people bring in their guns and get money in return. This will take guns off the streets and at no time are we saying you shouldn't have one, we are just saying that if you want money give us your arsenal.
4) No Guns for Kids. After finding out an 11 year old shot his step mom with a child's model shot gun there should be something done. I just think that if we are going to concern ourselves with tobacco marketing towards kids, and whether or not Captain Crunch is trying to make our kids obese, here is an industry which makes weapons for in children sizes. It just reminds me of the old Willy Wonka where Mike TV talks about his Colt 45 and says he has to wait till he's older to get a real one and his dad replies "Not till your 12 son". Maybe if Mr. TV knew that they made it in Mike's size, then he could really have one and then had some fun at the Chocolate Factory.
5) More funds for teachers and police. Lets face it, crime is going to get worse as the economy does. We need to educate more children so they too will realize what exactly a bachelors degree in philosophy or archaeology will get them.
Thursday, March 12, 2009
A whole lot of pork...
With all of the jaw-jaw regarding earmarks these days, you would think that McCain was President. Obama signed a $410 billion spending bill yesterday, which, according to the linked article, was "jammed with pet spending projects." This is, of course leading to editorial outcry and near cataclysm among some GOP legislators. Not everyone in the universe, however, is as worked up as Op-ed boards and McCain. The Opinionator does a good job of amalgamating a number of solid blog posts on the topic. I tend to share many of the views from these posts, so I'll leave it to Ryan Avent at The Bellows and his post on earmarks:
Congress just passed a $410 billion spending bill necessary to maintain government operations, which was some six-months overdue. Of that $410 billion, about $7.7 billion worth of funding will be allocated by Congressional earmark, rather than through typical funding formulas. That’s less than 2% of the bill’s total size, and it’s not at all clear that the earmarks represent additional spending, rather than just redirected spending. And yet the coverage of the bill’s passage is entirely focused around the earmark battle.In other - dare I say more important - pork issues, Kristof offers an interesting op-ed in today's New York Times (NYT). The focus of the column is the prevalence of MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) strains in communities and areas with a high density of pig farms. A study from the University of Iowa recently found that 49% of hogs and 45% of farmers tested carried MRSA. The reason this is important is that MRSA is resistant to drug treatment (a la the name), and is, therefore, often referred to as a "superbug".
The larger question is whether we as a nation have moved to a model of agriculture that produces cheap bacon but risks the health of all of us. And the evidence, while far from conclusive, is growing that the answer is yes...Related to food safety, Congress is working to pass a broad array of changes to our food safety scheme, with what appears to be bipartisan support:
So what’s going on here, and where do these antibiotic-resistant infections come from? Probably from the routine use — make that the insane overuse — of antibiotics in livestock feed. This is a system that may help breed virulent “superbugs” that pose a public health threat to us all.
The differences are not partisan. Republicans at the hearing said they, too, supported strong reforms.This could be great news, but given the lack of anyone complaining, I'm willing to bet that not much increased safety comes out of this process. Perhaps there are better ways to increase our food safety, rather than spend tons of cash on regulation. I would strongly urge America to rethink it's current food policy, starting with focusing on more local sustainable food production. Knowing where your bacon, eggs and spinach come from does not guarantee complete safety, but it sure doesn't hurt...
“On food safety, there is no daylight between Henry Waxman and Joe Barton,” said Representative Joe L. Barton of Texas, the senior Republican on the commerce committee.
Grades and Merits for Teachers
I have spent sometime over the past few years working in afterschool programs and working closely with teachers, councilors and secretaries who seem to always know what's going on in the school. With all this exposure, I can unequivitally tell you that merit based pay for teachers is almost as bad of an idea as "No Child Left Behind".
I actually agree with the Teachers Union in the belief that this will put teacher against each other and cut back on the cooperation between them, because lets face it, in the current economic situation that Bush has left us in, that we are spending our way out of, if it came down to back stabbing for more pay, consider it done. Not to mention throwing away the future of schools in poor neighborhoods and rural America, after all who wants to work there if your not going to make as much as someone working in a good school where the kids actually want to learn.
Another idea I'll throw out for teachers to consider is cheating. I've heard say of an area school that a principal gave answers to students to raise test scores. Well, why not short change our kids if it means more money for teachers. If high grades is a benchmark, I'll give out answers no problem.
I'm not really one to claim "oh, the children, think about the children" but when it comes to their education, there is no better war cry. What about reestablishing their gym, music and art programs? Why not try and start there. If President Obama's claim is that this is the start of reform for an area that hasn't had reform, why not start by reinstituting these programs that are always the first to get cut when educations budgets slim down?
I don't know, maybe its easier when your the president and your kids go to private schools in one of the nations worst publicc school system. Or maybe President Obama should have skipped the tour of private schools in the DC area and actaully thought about enrolling his girls in a DC Public School...but what good would that do for them?
I actually agree with the Teachers Union in the belief that this will put teacher against each other and cut back on the cooperation between them, because lets face it, in the current economic situation that Bush has left us in, that we are spending our way out of, if it came down to back stabbing for more pay, consider it done. Not to mention throwing away the future of schools in poor neighborhoods and rural America, after all who wants to work there if your not going to make as much as someone working in a good school where the kids actually want to learn.
Another idea I'll throw out for teachers to consider is cheating. I've heard say of an area school that a principal gave answers to students to raise test scores. Well, why not short change our kids if it means more money for teachers. If high grades is a benchmark, I'll give out answers no problem.
I'm not really one to claim "oh, the children, think about the children" but when it comes to their education, there is no better war cry. What about reestablishing their gym, music and art programs? Why not try and start there. If President Obama's claim is that this is the start of reform for an area that hasn't had reform, why not start by reinstituting these programs that are always the first to get cut when educations budgets slim down?
I don't know, maybe its easier when your the president and your kids go to private schools in one of the nations worst publicc school system. Or maybe President Obama should have skipped the tour of private schools in the DC area and actaully thought about enrolling his girls in a DC Public School...but what good would that do for them?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Suscribe to PL
Posts
All Comments